https://online.clackamas.edu/mod/resource/view.php?id=1619547

Description

Essay #2 (Literary Analysis) Length: 2–4 pages, MLA format (including citations), plus a works cited page Rough Draft: 2/27, post to corresponding Moodle forum (for credit and peer review) Revised Rough: 3/03 post to corresponding Moodle forum (for credit and peer review) Final Draft: 3/06, upload to corresponding Moodle dropbox (with reflection) Essay: For this essay, you will analyze one of the short stories or poems we have studied in order to show how a specific theme is developed in that story or poem. If you choose to compare two stories or poems (or story/poem and film), that is just fine, though be sure your analysis of each is thorough. No outside sources are required for this assignment, as the text itself tells you what you need to know. You will discover your interpretation of your chosen story/poem’s theme by analyzing the story/poem’s dominant literary elements. In presenting evidence for your interpretation, you will focus on two or three literary elements (tone, descriptive language, symbolism, etc.) you think are most relevant and evaluate those elements for their effectiveness in conveying the story/poem’s theme. You will incorpo- rate quotations from and paraphrases of the short story or poem to support your thesis and ideas. The purpose of this assignment is to help you develop as a critical reader, thinker, and writer of and about college-level texts. Your audience for this essay is anyone who has read the story or poem and has a basic knowledge of it. There is no need for more than several sentences of summary since your audience already knows what happens in the text. Think of yourself as writing to a reading group that has chosen this story (or poem) for its latest “story (or poem) of the week.” Such a group is likely to generate different interpretations of the story. How would your interpretation fit into an ongoing discussion of it? Because this essay is a scholarly analysis of a text, a relatively formal, objective third-person tone is appropriate. (Remember, this is not a book report, and not a biography of the author, but an analysis of the text itself). The final draft must be clearly organized and carefully edited, demonstrating skills you will learn in this class. Again, you will workshop this analysis with your peers. Peer Reviews: Follow the workshop guidelines in the Peer Review Workshop forums (in Weeks 8 & 9). To receive credit, each peer review must be thorough and complete (1–2 pages) when addressing said guidelines. Be sure to post placeholders in each workshop forum ASAP for the peers whom you plan to review.Instructor Feedback: You will receive feedback from me or the peer mentor during our Week 8 online conference. Please bring at least two (2) questions about work you have done and/or still need to do on your draft. You will also visit the online Writing Center. Once you have received feedback during Week 8, you will revise the rough draft for a second Peer Review Workshop during Week 9 before the Final Draft is due. Reflection: Once you have reviewed feedback from your peers and me/peer mentor to revise your final draft, com- pose a brief reflection on how you used these comments to make your final draft stronger. There is no word count for this, but do take time to consider how you are using feedback to make revisions