HCA 333 Saray Perez et al. v. Wyeth Laboratories Case Study Paper In this module, you are going to submit the second of four short papers (600-words minimu

HCA 333 Saray Perez et al. v. Wyeth Laboratories Case Study Paper In this module, you are going to submit the second of four short papers (600-words minimum). In each paper you will read the scenario and present a position on that issue. All papers shall cite a minimum of three sources. One of the sources must be from the text, one must be an Internet source (with hyperlink) and the third may be from any source (print, personal experience, Internet, learned treatise, journal, etc.). You shall cite each source in APA format. The paper is due no later than Sunday 11:59PM EST/EDT.New medical treatments, by strict definition, are not the “current medical practice.” Should a physician be immune from liability for harm suffered from a patient who is among the first to be treated in a new and innovative manner in which the potential risks have not been discovered? Report on a new and possibly innovative medical treatment (i.e., medication or medical procedure, diagnostic tests, etc.) where there exist uncharted waters about the possible outcome. Review carefully the Perez case as a starting point. Saray Perez, et al. v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc., et al. (A-16-98)
Argued March 2, 1999 — Decided August 9, 1999
O’HERN, J., writing for a majority of the Court.
This appeal concerns Norplant, a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved, reversible
contraceptive that prevents pregnancy for up to five years.
The Norplant contraceptive employs six thin, flexible, closed capsules that contain a synthetic
hormone, levonorgestrel. The capsules are implanted under the skin of a woman’s upper arm
during an in-office surgical procedure characterized by the manufacturer as minor. A low,
continuous dosage of the hormone diffuses through the capsule walls and into the woman’s
bloodstream. Removal occurs during an in-office procedure, similar to the insertion process.
Because of the procedural posture of this case, the Supreme Court was required to accept
plaintiffs’ version of the facts as true. According to plaintiffs, Wyeth began a massive advertising
campaign for Norplant in 1991, which it directed at women rather than at their doctors. Wyeth
advertised on television and in women’s magazines, such as Glamour, Mademoiselle, and
Cosmopolitan. None of the advertisements warned of any dangers or side effects associated with
Norplant, but rather praised its convenience and simplicity. Wyeth also sent a letter to physicians
advising that it was about to launch a national advertising program in magazines that the
physicians’ patients may read.
In 1995, several women began to file lawsuits in various New Jersey counties claiming injuries
that resulted from their use of Norplant. Their principal claim was that Wyeth, distributors of
Norplant in the United States, failed to warn adequately about the side effects associated with the
contraceptive, including weight gain, headaches, dizziness, nausea, diarrhea, acne, vomiting,
fatigue, facial hair growth, numbness in the arms and legs, irregular menstruation, hair loss, leg
cramps, anxiety and nervousness, vision problems, anemia, mood swings and depression, high
blood pressure, and removal complications that resulted in scarring.
Class action certification was denied and all New Jersey cases involving Norplant were
consolidated in Middlesex County. Following a case management conference, Perez’s counsel
sought a determination of whether the “learned intermediary” doctrine applied. The “learned
intermediary” doctrine generally relieves a pharmaceutical manufacturer of an independent duty
to warn the ultimate user of prescription drugs, so long as it has supplied the physician with
information about a drug’s dangerous propensities. Five representative plaintiffs, including Perez,
were selected to challenge Wyeth’s motion for summary judgment concerning the “learned
intermediary” doctrine. Subsequently, the trial court dismissed those plaintiffs’ complaints,
concluding that even when a manufacturer advertises directly to the public, and a woman is
influenced by the advertising campaign, a physician nevertheless retains the duty to weigh the
benefits and risks associated with a drug before deciding whether the drug is appropriate for the
patient. Thus, the trial court held the “learned intermediary” doctrine applicable to plaintiffs’
actions.
The trial court was not concerned with the effect that a warning had on the consumer plaintiffs
because the Products Liability Act, N.J.S.A. 2A:58C-1 to -11, measures the adequacy of a
warning based on the knowledge and characteristics of the health-care provider and not the
ultimate consumer. The trial court further found that Perez and the other representative plaintiffs
had failed to provide expert testimony to rebut the statutory presumption under the Products
Liability Act that the manufacturer’s warning is adequate when it has been approved by the FDA.
Finally, the trial court determined that Perez failed to establish that her injuries were proximately
caused by any failure on the manufacturer’s part.
On appeal, Perez and the other representative plaintiffs challenged the trial court’s failure to hear
expert testimony on the adequacy of the warnings and the decision concerning proximate cause,
maintaining that “it [had been] specifically agreed that the production of expert testimony would
await the outcome of the decision on the issue of the learned intermediary doctrine.” The
Appellate Division affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary judgment and its determination
that the learned intermediary doctrine applied. The Appellate Division further noted that Section
6(d)(2) of the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability (1997) (Restatement) may require
a warning when the physician or health-care provider has a “diminished role as an evaluator or
decision maker,” in which case the manufacturer would have a duty to warn patients directly.
However, the court agreed with the trial court that if the warning was legislatively deemed
adequate and has been given to the proper party, then no warning defect existed under the
Products Liability Law.
The Supreme Court granted Perez’s petition for review.
HELD: The “learned intermediary” doctrine does not apply to the direct marketing of drugs to
consumers; prescription drug manufacturers that market their products directly to consumers
should be subject to claims by consumers if their advertising fails to provide an adequate
warning of the product’s dangerous propensities.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
HCA 333 Saray Perez et al. v. Wyeth Laboratories Case Study Paper In this module, you are going to submit the second of four short papers (600-words minimu
Just from $13/Page
Order Essay
Homework Market Pro
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Our Unique Features

Custom Papers Means Custom Papers

This is what custom writing means to us: Your essay starts from scratch. Plagiarism is unacceptable. We demand the originality of our academic essay writers and they only deliver authentic and original papers. 100% guaranteed! If your final version is not as expected, we will revise it immediately.

Qualified and Experienced Essay Writers

Our team consists of carefully selected writers with in-depth expertise. Each writer in our team is selected based on their writing skills and experience. Each team member is able to provide plagiarism-free, authentic and high-quality content within a short turnaround time.

Free Unlimited Revisions

If you think we missed something, send your order for a free revision. You have 10 days to submit the order for review after you have received the final document. You can do this yourself after logging into your personal account or by contacting our support.

Prompt Delivery and 100% Assuarance

We understand you. Spending your hard earned money on a writing service is a big deal. It is a big investment and it is difficult to make the decision. That is why we support our claims with guarantees. We want you to be reassured as soon as you place your order. Here are our guarantees: Your deadlines are important to us. When ordering, please note that delivery will take place no later than the expiry date.

100% Originality & Confidentiality

Every paper we write for every order is 100% original. To support this, we would be happy to provide you with a plagiarism analysis report on request.We use several writing tools checks to ensure that all documents you receive are free from plagiarism. Our editors carefully review all quotations in the text. We also promise maximum confidentiality in all of our services.

24/7 Customer Support

We help students, business professionals and job seekers around the world in multiple time zones. We also understand that students often keep crazy schedules. No problem. We are there for you around the clock. If you need help at any time, please contact us. An agent is always available for you.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

Our services are second to none. Every time you place an order, you get a personal and original paper of the highest quality.

Essays

Essay Writing Service

While a college paper is the most common order we receive, we want you to understand that we have college writers for virtually everything, including: High school and college essays Papers, book reviews, case studies, lab reports, tests All graduate level projects, including theses and dissertations Admissions and scholarship essays Resumes and CVā€™s Web content, copywriting, blogs, articles Business writing ā€“ reports, marketing material, white papers Research and data collection/analysis of any type.

Admissions

Any Kind of Essay Writing!

Whether you are a high school student struggling with writing five-paragraph essays, an undergraduate management student stressing over a research paper, or a graduate student in the middle of a thesis or dissertation, homeworkmarketpro.com has a writer for you. We can also provide admissions or scholarship essays, a resume or CV, as well as web content or articles. Writing an essay for college admission takes a certain kind of writer. They have to be knowledgeable about your subject and be able to grasp the purpose of the essay.

Reviews

Quality Check and Editing Support

Every paper is subject to a strict editorial and revision process. This is to ensure that your document is complete and accurate and that all of your instructions have been followed carefully including creating reference lists in the formats APA, Harvard, MLA, Chicago / Turabian.

Reviews

Prices and Discounts

We are happy to say that we offer some of the most competitive prices in this industry. Since many of our customers are students, job seekers and small entrepreneurs, we know that money is a problem. Therefore, you will find better prices with us compared to writing services of this calibre.