Categories: Uncategorized

Engaging, Assessing, Intervening, Evaluating, and Terminating at the Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Levels

Description

Students are to complete this assignment based on an individual, group, and community from the field internship agency. This assignment will focus on the components of the Helping Process, which covers Engagement through Termination. Directions: Introduce the individual case, group, or community. (Circumstantial to student’s internship or example of a case note as a social worker would conduct for an intake) Share what you learned from the all-class role play (New learning from discussion on the readings on evaluation at micro or mezzo levels for generalists must be in this assignment). Discuss each of the following practice areas as you experience using these techniques/skills at the micro, mezzo or macro level. Exploring and Engaging- relationship building skills, interviewing skills, communication with empathy/authenticity, basic interviewing skills, clarifying roles and responsibilities. Exploring, Assessing and Planning- Developing goals and formulating a contract; Exploring and understanding the situation and clients’ strengths, interpersonal and environmental factors, and any other important factors. Assessing and Intervening – Identify any theory and conceptual frameworks that are relevant to the case. Planning and implementing – Incorporating theories, contracting/treatment planning, connecting needs to resources, creating goals and evaluating goals. Terminating-Resolution of problems, reviewing treatment goals and successes, securing additional resources. End by providing comments on what this process meant for your learning experience. Identify five resources that relate to the problem(s) in the case and submit in writing. Rubric Assignment 3: Assignment 3: Engaging, Assessing, Intervening, Evaluating, and Terminating at the Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Levels Rubric Assignment 3: Assignment 3: Engaging, Assessing, Intervening, Evaluating, and Terminating at the Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Levels Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Introduced the assignment as the individual case, group, or community 2.8 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 2.52 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 2.24 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1.96 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 2.8 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Share what was learned from the all-class role play 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Discussed engagement at the generalist level based on knowledge gained in class and field internship 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Discussed assessment at the generalist level based on knowledge gained in class and field internship 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Discussed intervening at the generalist level based on knowledge gained in class and field internship 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Discussed evaluation in social work are at the generalist level based on knowledge gained in class and field internship 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Discussed resolution of problems, reviewing treatment goals and successes, securing additional resources 1.4 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.26 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.12 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.98 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 1.4 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content Provided comments on what this process means for your learning experience that you will use at internship next semester 2.1 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 1.89 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 1.68 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 1.47 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 2.1 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Resources Provided a list of five resources 0.7 pts EXCEEDS EXPECTATIONS 0.63 pts MEETS EXPECTATIONS 0.56 pts NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0.49 pts MINIMAL 0 pts FAILS TO MEET EXPECTATIONS 0.7 pts Total Points: 14

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Engaging, Assessing, Intervening, Evaluating, and Terminating at the Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Levels
This is a Snippet Preview, get a Complete Solution Here
Order Essay
Phyllis Mugure

View Comments

Recent Posts

Introduction to psychology | Assignments Market

ASSIGNMENT 08 S01 Introduction to Psychology I Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy…

3 years ago

Education | Assignments Market

Include a comprehensive, thoughtful and critical analysis to the arguments and perspectives of the readings…

3 years ago

Session 2 Discussion | Assignments Market

Discussion Prompt: Plagiarism As a writer, one of the gravest errors to make is to…

3 years ago

CJL Writing Questions | Assignments Market

Question 1: Write a Hypothetical. Write a legal memorandum analyzing what happened in the following…

3 years ago

short HW all the questions below | Assignments Market

You work at Happy Joe's family restaurant and want to see if customer meal satisfaction…

3 years ago

321 solve … | Assignments Market

The Assignment must be submitted on Blackboard (WORD format only) via allocated folder. Assignments submitted…

3 years ago