In this assignment, you will apply your knowledge of bias, perspective, and critical thought to a given example.

Description

In this assignment, you will apply your knowledge of bias, perspective, and critical thought to a given example. Step 1: Consider the scenario: Most college instructors require students to turn off their cell phones in class so that their phones will not ring and also to prevent students from texting during class. The policy has become a serious point of contention among students, many of whom rely on cell phone applications to help organize their ever-changing schedules. Parents, too, have begun raising concerns over their children’s safety. Parents are worried that they will be unable to reach their children during an emergency if all phones are shut off. As a member of the College Board, it is your responsibility to read all such incoming mail. The following is a small sample: Letter 1: Our civil liberties should never be subject to change. What the school board is attempting to do here is remind students that their rights can be given and taken away by authority. This particular case may be insignificant, but a larger philosophical debate regarding the inherent rights of the people is anything but minor. Letter 2: I worked hard to get into college. The classroom encompasses everything I value in higher education. It is not the right place or time for students to be fiddling with their cell phones. As a student, I support the new initiative. I hope other students will understand why this move is so important. Letter 3: I put my trust in the authority at hand. If school officials believe that having cell phones in the classroom is a distraction, I trust their judgment. The public is generally ignorant anyway, and it’s likely that they are expressing opinions out of emotion, not a sense of truth. Step 2: Analyze different perspectives and biases. In a two to three-page (minimum) written speech, to be given in front of an audience of parents and college faculty, in which you support the school’s decision to turn off cell phones during class, address the following. Use the aforementioned letters as examples to refute: Identify evidence of bias in each of the three letters. How can you describe the notion of bias? Define perspective. How does the concept of perspective influence the opinions of the speaker in each letter? Is the school’s new proposal fair? Give your view with a set of arguments to support your view. Give an opposing view to each letter and its arguments, and give your explanation for why your arguments should be more persuasive than the opposition’s. Is there a bias at work in your view as well? Briefly explain the perspectives of both sides of each argument. How does critical thought affect perspective? Step 3: When you have completed your assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place. Cite any sources in APA format. See the rubric below for grading details.   Rubric Week 10 Assignment Rubric Week 10 Assignment Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Cognitive and emotive content 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Correctly determines the cognitive and emotive content of the speech. 8 to >6.0 pts Need Some Improvement Somewhat determines the cognitive and emotive cognitive content. A few details may be missing. 6 to >4.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Minimally determines the cognitive and emotive cognitive content or there are inaccuracies. 4 to >0 pts Poor Does not accurately determine the cognitive and emotive cognitive content. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Benefits of cognitive and emotive content in a political context? 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Thoroughly and accurately explains the benefits of using primarily cognitive or primarily emotive content within a political context. 8 to >6.0 pts Need Some Improvement Somewhat explains the benefits of using primarily cognitive or primarily emotive content within a political context. 6 to >4.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Minimally explains the benefits of using primarily cognitive or primarily emotive content within a political context. 4 to >0 pts Poor Does not adequately explain the benefits of using primarily cognitive or primarily emotive content within a political context. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Bias and reliability 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Correctly identifies any occurrence of bias within the speech and thoroughly explains how bias can influence reliability. 8 to >6.0 pts Need Some Improvement Correctly identifies occurrences of bias within the speech and somewhat explains how bias can influence reliability. 6 to >4.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Identifies occurrences of bias within the speech but there may be inaccuracies; minimally explains how bias can influence reliability. 4 to >0 pts Poor Does not correctly identify occurrences of bias within the speech and does not explain how bias can influence reliability. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Soundness and clarity of the message 10 to >8.0 pts Excellent Thoroughly evaluates the soundness and clarity of the message. 8 to >6.0 pts Need Some Improvement Somewhat evaluates the soundness and clarity of the message. 6 to >4.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Minimally evaluates the soundness and clarity of the message. 4 to >0 pts Poor Does not adequately evaluates the soundness and clarity of the message or the information is inaccurate. 10 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Mechanics and Grammar 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent No errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling. Easy to read and understand. 4 to >3.0 pts Need Some Improvement Minor errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling do not interfere with reading/understanding 3 to >2.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Some errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling may interfere with reading/understanding. 2 to >0 pts Poor Numerous errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling which interfere with reading/understanding or is limited in development. 5 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Citation 5 to >4.0 pts Excellent No errors in APA format: in- text citation(s); reference page. 4 to >3.0 pts Need Some Improvement Minor errors in APA format: in- text citation(s); reference page. 3 to >2.0 pts Need Significant Improvement Some errors in APA format: intext citation(s); reference page. 2 to >0 pts Poor Numerous errors in APA format: in-text citation(s); reference page. 5 pts Total Points: 50