Dogma 95 as an attempt to make an authentic film with a real acting performance true to reality. An analysis of Idioterne and Mifune

Description

I have to write a term paper about if the Dogma rules impacted the authenticity and realistic acting performances of the films “Idioterne” and “Mifune”. My professor gave me a D, where his main complaint was that there was no real red string and my arguments were hard to follow. What do I want to say? Often times, my paragraphs go from one to another, so my text has to be rewritten, although my sources and the main research question can still be there, just the term paper is not good in this current state. Especially the analysis of the two films and the comparision / conclusion have to be rerworked entirely to have an easy-to-understand argumentation…                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        Here are some points for example:  Important changes: I have illustrated this I conclude that. One paragraph builds on the other  Examples:  “Lars von Trier, director of the second Dogma film Idioterne and co-founder of the Dogma film , feels that the required restrictions relieve him of aesthetic anxieties, allowing him to focus on the film and its story. For him, the most important thing about Dogma was that it allowed directors to focus more on the characters and what they contained. A lot of the Dogma rules would have to be decided up front on how they were going to realize the film. All the provisions about handheld cameras, no special costumes, etc. promise a strict tie to reality, a simple, unvarnished reality. But Dogma 95 is actually an arbitrarily generic system that has no greater or lesser connection to reality than the rules for Japanese noh-theater.” Why all of a sudden Noh theater? / go into detail!  “After Festen and Idioterne, Mifune is the third installment in the Dogma 95 series. Mifune, from Danish director Soren Kragh-Jacobsen, avowedly adheres to the vow of chastity mischievously made by Lars von Trier four years ago: Only shoot on location, no fancy props, costumes or effects, only color film, only natural light, only handheld cameras. The fact that it doesn’t follow these rules, and that these rules themselves are arbitrary and based on a naive view of what constitutes “reality,” doesn’t spoil the enjoyment of this seductive film. The aspects of authenticity as they apply to Idiots generally apply to this film as well.” This passage is as written by a film critic, stay consistent linguistically!  Red thread! Embed sources! Personality neurology explain term! Europe Doxa Explain terms!!! Dogma rules are not from Lars von Trier, but from Dogma Manifest! Do not jump around! Argumentation!!! Clear sentences, conceptually. What do I want to write?