unknown- see describtion ( Human Services- Research Methods)

Description

Please open and read the attached instructions for your annotated bibliography carefully.  Please note that this assignment is submitted in two parts. Please read ALL intructions carefully. And choose only one method to do the 5 peer reviewed Journals on. Professor is a stickler with the APA format being on point. Thank you  Please try to keep it at 1800 words as the requirments are 1500-1800. ADDED INFOFROMATION Title had to be cahnged to Using Case Studies to Understand Mental Health: An Annotated Bibliography Here are a few reminders about the AB.  Stage 1 = title page and references only–no annotations. Stage 2 = title page, introduction, annotations & a references page.    Requirements 1.   Write an introduction for the annotated bibliography that connects to the title you created.  For example, consider this hypothetical title–How to Use Randomized Control Trial Methodology to Study Public Health: A Brief Annotated Bibliography.  This title would lead a reader to believe that annotated bibliography would focus on the RTC method, and all the annotations would focus on some facet of public health.  This is an appropriate title for someone who wanted to focus on RTC methodology.  2.   The introduction should be at least 250 words in length. What goes in the introduction?    It should make clear that the purpose of this project is to highlight how different methods are used to answer different kinds of social-behavioral research questions.  Use your book to define and explain the method you chose (longitudinal or case study). You must also identify strengths and weaknesses of this method. You should explain its appeal to social work and HUS.  You will need to find at least one additional scholarly source to support your thesis.  The introduction should also link to the annotations–describe how they are structured and why.   3. Next, present the annotations. All annotations must: 1. Be in bulleted paragraph format. The content in each bullet MUST be in complete, grammatically correct sentences. 2. Each annotation should be at least 200 words. 3. Each annotation should not be copied from the abstract and should NOT contain any quoted material. 4. Be paraphrased using your words—do not use any paraphrasing tool. Usage of paraphrasing tools counts as academic dishonesty and will result in a zero for the project. 5. Be modeled after the sample I provided for you.  I will take a significant deduction if you write the annotation content in short essay format.   Here is an excerpt from my sample (please note that this is not double-spaced; also there is no hanging indent as the announcements function does not allow me to format for that). Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 5, 937-975. doi.org/10.1086/374403 • Purpose of the study: Pager’s study examined the impact of race and a criminal record on the likelihood of being hired for entry-level jobs. • Hypotheses: She hypothesized that blacks and those with criminal records would get fewer job offers than whites and those without criminal records.  • Methodology: Pager used an audit experiment (field experiment) to test her hypotheses by sending four 23-year old male confederates (fake applicants), two black and two white, to apply at random for 350 entry level jobs in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. The confederates submitted a standardized resume that manipulated the “applicant’s” criminal record (no record or record). • Reason for methodology choice: Pager noted that previous studies often used surveys, but because survey data is correlational only, it was impossible to know how or why a criminal record affected hiring decisions, or if there were other applicant characteristics, e.g., race, which might have affected the hiring process. The audit field experiment allowed her control over unwanted variation in the resume, and to be able to isolate the effect of race in a real-life setting, because her “applicants” applied in person. • Findings: The results showed that both race and criminal record affected call-back rates. 5% of blacks with a record got call-backs compared to 17% of whites. 14% of blacks without a record got call-backs, compared to 34% of whites. These results highlight the effects of both race and criminal record. Of note is the finding that whites with criminal records were more likely to get call-backs than blacks without them, demonstrating that race was more impactful in the hiring decision than was criminal record. • Limitations: Pager noted several limitations to her study, including the fact that patterns might be different in other cities, and that her matched confederates were attractive college students whose friendly interpersonal style might have muted the impact of the manipulation.  • Citations: This is a respected study that has been cited 2,883 times as of July 2020; Google showed that 101 other articles addressed the same topic, supporting the importance of the issue to those who study race, employment, and incarceration. • Relevance to the field. The article is highly relevant to social workers and human services professionals who work with employers needing to enhance diversity training, those who work with minorities with criminal records, and those who have difficulty in finding employment or in coping with chronic unemployment. Author, Initial. (year of publication). The title of the article. The Title of the Journal, Volume number, issue, pages. doi.org/