Arguing a position outline

Description

I need an OUTLINE and my POSITION is: The Naturalization process for American residents looking to become citizens should be shorter and more accessible. the kind OF ESSAY IS ARGUING A POSITION All sources must come from the Valencia College Library. SO I got those 2 sources Pro-source 1: Article, “Creating New Americans: The Essence of Americanism under the Citizenship Test.” Citation: Orgad, Liav. “Creating New Americans: The Essence of Americanism under the Citizenship Test.” Houston Law Review, vol. 48, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 1227–1297. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=59668773&site=ehost-live. Brief Summary of the source (3-4 sentences): This article explains the American citizenship test, compares it to that of other countries, and argues that the stated purpose of the citizenship test is undermined by its content. The biggest takeaway I got from reading this article is that in many ways the citizenship test has proved as an ineffective assessment for naturalization. I will be using this article in my essay to provide details of why the current citizenship test is ineffective. This way, I can argue that reform is needed.   Pro-source 2: “IS MILITARY NATURALIZATION STILL A FAST TRACK TO U.S. CITIZENSHIP?” Citation: RODRÍGUEZ, KAMIR CINTRÓN. “Is Military Naturalization Still a Fast Track to U.S. Citizenship?” Revista de Derecho Puertorriqueño, vol. 59, no. 2, Jan. 2020, pp. 233–262. EBSCOhost, search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&AuthType=shib&db=a9h&AN=146578459&site=ehost-live. Brief Summary of the source (3-4 sentences): This article explains one fast way to get the US citizenship by going to the military, a very respectable way to obtain citizenship. I believe that if there are people who offer their services to the United States military, they would deserve to get the citizenship. I can argue that the naturalization of these people is necessary for the American military.